Photos: Toyin Saraki With Michelle And Barack Obama At The White House

Pictured is Toyin Saraki, wife of Nigerian Senate President, Bukola Saraki pictured with president Barack Obama and his wife Michelle while representing African women at the White House summit on Global Development in Washington D.C last month..

Mrs. Saraki who is also the President of the Wellbeing Foundation Africa (WBFA), spoke on the progress made in moving towards achieving Global Development Goals (GDGs) and also emphasized on the importance of midwives in reducing the rate of maternal and new born mortality and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Godspower Oshodin

A Poet, Writer, International Media Consultant, Film-Maker, and Co-author of 'Global Seal of Integrity'

19 thoughts on “Photos: Toyin Saraki With Michelle And Barack Obama At The White House

  • Jun 12, 2017 at 7:37 am

    [url=]buy trenbolone injection[/url] – [url=]buy trenbolone injection[/url]
    I and also my buddies were following the excellent hints from the blog and so unexpectedly I had a horrible feeling I had not expressed respect to the site owner for those tips. The people are actually for that reason passionate to read through them and now have surely been having fun with them. Appreciate your turning out to be well considerate and then for choosing some very good areas most people are really desirous to understand about. Our honest apologies for not expressing appreciation to sooner.

  • Jun 17, 2017 at 11:15 am

    [url=]viagra[/url] – [url=]buy trenbolone injection[/url]
    This website is containing a nice material of comic YouTube video clips, I liked it a lot.

  • Jul 4, 2017 at 10:27 am

    ?Essay composing guide
    Critical Evaluation
    Critical Evaluation
    The ability to critically evaluate guidance can be an essential ability for postgraduate researchers. This talent is particularly pertinent to the production of literature reviews, where a critical appraisal or analysis belonging to the literature is required.
    In this particular section, we suggest choosing ‘PROMPT’, a structured solution to critical evaluation of related information (Provenance, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Presentation, Timeliness). Provenance
    The provenance of the piece of intel (i.e. who produced it? Where did it come from?) may provide you with a useful clue to its reliability. It represents the ‘credentials’ of the piece of answers that assistance its status and perceived value. It is, therefore, very important to be able to identify the author, sponsoring body or source of your material.
    Factors to consider about authors:
    Are they acknowledged experts while in the subject area?
    Are they respected and reliable resources
    Are their views controversial?
    Have they been frequently cited by other authors during the discipline
    To get out whether material is frequently cited requires either prior knowledge or a citation search.
    Are they known to have a particular perspective for the topic?
    Factors to consider about sponsoring organisations:
    What type of organisation is it? Commercial organisation, voluntary organisation, statutory body, research organisation?
    How clearly established is the organisation?
    Does the organisation have any vested interests inside the subject area being researched?
    Factors to consider about the method of publication:
    Any individual can publish anything over the world large website or post to some discussion list. This has to be judged on its have merit and with reference to the author’s credentials.
    What do you know belonging to the editor and/or the editorial board and how their editorial policy influences what will be published?
    Is the journal nicely regarded? Does it have a huge rating with the Journal Citation Reports? Does this matter?
    Is the particulars peer reviewed? Plenty of electronic journals do not have a peer professional review practice.
    The provenance of the piece of knowledge isn’t a direct clue to its superior. There is certainly something called the ‘stable theory’, which suggests that academic get the job done is often valued highly just given that it emanates from the prestigious research group or is published in a very prestigious journal. So we should judge information and facts on its private merits. However, provenance could be an indirect clue to the reliability of data – a safety net that gives you the opportunity to check things out. Provenance can affect other people’s confidence from the resources you may be citing.
    Relevance is undoubtedly an important aspect of answers top notch. It is simply not a property belonging to the tips itself, but rather of its relationship to the need to have you have identified. It may be a piece of big excellent facts but not relevant to the question that you are asking or the scope of your search. There are quite a lot of ways in which the info may or may not be relevant to your needs.
    Geographical (it may relate to countries or areas which you might be not interested in).
    Degree (it may be too detailed/specialised or too general/simple for that amount at which that you’re working).
    Emphasis (it may not contain the kind of tips you could be seeking – this is often a question of emphasis, which may not be identifiable from the abstract).
    A tip for determining relevance is to
    be clear about your prerequisites – this will help you to definitely be ruthless in discarding things over the basis of relevance.
    try to avoid having to check out things in complete – search within the title, abstract or summary, keywords and descriptors. As soon as you are evaluating a major body of material, learn to skim check out and/or scan help and advice to get a quick indication of what it is about. For way more details on reading techniques see the Effective reading information site from Deakin University.
    consider research in context. Do the research gains furnish a unique insight into an aspect of your subject? Do they confirm or refute the findings of other researchers?
    In an ideal world, ‘objective’ or ‘balanced’ guidance would current all the evidence and all the arguments, and leave you to definitely weigh this up and draw conclusions. With the real world, however, we recognise that all tips is presented from the position of interest, although this may not necessarily be intentional. Objectivity, therefore, may be an unachievable ideal.
    This usually means that the onus is on you, the reader, to acquire a critical awareness on the positions represented in what you learn, and to take account of this at the time you interpret the information and facts. It is usually important to recognise that your individual belief units and opinions will influence your ability to be dispassionate and objectively evaluate information and facts.
    In some cases, authors may be explicitly expressing a particular viewpoint – this is perfectly valid provided that they are explicit about the perspective they represent. Hidden bias or errors of omission, whether or not it is deliberate, may very well be misleading. Consider the following:
    Perspectives: do the authors state clearly the viewpoint they are taking?
    Opinions: academic articles will often existing unsubstantiated theories for discussion. Seem out for opinion presented as if it had been fact.
    Language: should be a useful danger sign. Look and feel out for language that is definitely either emotionally charged or vague.
    Sponsorship: whether commercial, political or personal. For example, academic research may be sponsored by industry or government. This does not necessarily make the research less goal however it may make its interpretation selective. Make sure that all potential vested interests are clearly identified which the sponsors are happy to give entry to the actual research information.
    When producing a literature report you will find a particular onus on you to definitely recognise any selective interpretation of information. You will have to comment on any significant omissions or biases that you choose to may encounter in other people’s findings.
    For this aspect of PROMPT we do not refer to the evaluation of research methods for every se, but to the details produced as a result of applying particular methods. With your knowledge on the methods made use of on your subject area think about the following.
    Is it clear how the research was carried out?
    Have been the methods acceptable?
    Ask some elementary questions about sample size and nature, use of control groups, questionnaire style.
    Are the benefits produced consistent with the methods stated?
    Are the methods suitable in your needs? Do you must have the methods to be the same as yours or different to yours?
    Do not assume that considering the fact that a research report has become accepted for publication, it is error-free and meets a certain standard. There have been cases of fraudulent research that have successfully fooled the research establishment and been published in higher profile journals.
    The way in which critical information is presented has a profound effect to the way we acquire and perceive it. There are a large amount of aspects of presentation, any of which, if badly applied, can construct a barrier relating to the message together with the audience.
    For example:
    choice of colour
    choice of font type and size
    use of diagrams and photographs
    lack of or illogical structure
    confusing layout
    poor use of language
    inappropriate or ineffectual creating style
    poor reproduction.
    Be aware that poor presentation and inappropriate or confusing use of language will hinder your ability to critically evaluate the academic content. Try not to let poor presentation stop you from making use of what would probably otherwise be high-quality good quality, relevant data.
    The date when info was produced or published will be an important aspect of fine quality. This shouldn’t be very as painless as saying that ‘good’ details has to be up to date; it relies upon on your specifics will want.
    Factors to consider include:
    Is it clear in the event the details was produced?
    Does the date from the related information meet my demands?
    Is it obsolete? (Has it been superseded?)
    RATE THIS RESOURCE: stanford coursework

  • Jul 5, 2017 at 7:10 am

    [url=]kamagra 100 mg[/url]
    What’s up dear, are you enjoying with this humorous YouTube video? Hmmm, thatГ­s nice, I am as well watching this YouTube humorous video at the moment.

  • Jul 6, 2017 at 1:16 pm

    Good Web page, Preserve the very good work. Thanks a ton.
    [url=]diet pills that work[/url]

    [url=] fast weight loss pills[/url]
    [url=] easy steps to lose weight fast[/url]

  • Jul 13, 2017 at 1:54 am

    Now Kristoff, the easiest way to describe him is Viking in a business suit .

    Pete by now had also come his lot and the girl was cleaning his cock
    off and sometimes taking the whole lot in a deep throat action.

  • Jul 31, 2017 at 6:59 am

    And what s left are logistical and emotional. There is now a
    key lock on the bedroom door.

  • Jul 31, 2017 at 9:47 pm

    What’s Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I
    have discovered It positively helpful and it has
    aided me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & aid different users like
    its helped me. Great job.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download Our App:

Download Our APP!